Posted by
Cassandra on Sunday, June 22, 2008 10:34:43 AM
Continued from Part II: "The Left's Narrative"
The collective swoon over B. Barak Hussein Muhammed Obama is getting corrosive. If Bush Derangement Syndrome (BDS) (see
parts I and
II) was a public health hazard, we ain't seen nothing yet. The Morbid Obama Intoxication (MOI) beats BDS on all fronts.
For
a proper understanding we must turn beyond the field of psychology - to
philosophy - which explains matters in broad abstracts. As is happens,
a number of parameters alarmingly coincide - and here it gets sticky -
with the German interbellum.
We all know how that ended. Nota
bene, I'm not collating Obama with Adolf Hitler, or lumping him with
Nazi propagandist Joseph Goebbels; although he is playing the campaign
like a full-fledged demagogue, the problem rather lies with his fans
and admirers.
The American Left is traditionally steeped in
pragmatism. That may sound innocent and practical, but it comes with a
few less known consequences which seldom come to the fore all at once.
The
champion of pragmatism is the American pioneering psychologist William
James (1842-1910), who gave the concept its name. The brother of
novelist Henry James and of diarist Alice James wrote: 'The true,' to
put it very briefly, is only the expedient in the way of our thinking,
just as 'the right' is only the expedient in the way of our behaving."
Dewey applied pragmatism to education.
Pragmatism is a
Romanticist version of relativism. Extrovert action and passion are
valued over introvert reflexion and reason. Pragmatism is essentially
amoral. It has contributed to the nastiness of Postmodernism by
positing a sort of secular, Western form of
taqqiyah,
which is governed by the same principle: our goal is so ethical that
even the unethical is justified in reaching it - the aim justifies the
means, truth is flexible and depends on the need of the moment, a
utility expedient towards realization of the goal.
As a
consequence pragmatism is rather dishonestly presented as the opposite
of what it aims to achieve. It seemingly is the practical over theory,
portends to position the individual in a central role, ostensibly
respects reason and facts, while its very principle constitutes an
assault on logic (everything is in flux), gives a central role to
feelings and passions (subjectivism), denies reality (nothing is
absolute), and reduces the individual to an atom of the collective.
That collective - in pragmatism is usually 'our generation,'
'liberals,' or 'society'; it is not an aggregate, but an 'organic
entity.'
It holds a number of Orwellian concepts, as Hegel's
'Ethical Whole' to which individual free will must be sacrificed for
the good of the Collective Will, and Rousseau's notion which has come
down to us in Marxism, of 'true freedom through the state'. A picture
of mystical group-think is emerging from the Obama campaign which looks
ominously familiar, but is by itself not enough to warrant great
concern.
Is gets more hazardous when pragmatism is coupled to
dogma and subjective passions spiral out of control. This is the
winning ticket that made National Socialism such a lethal ideology:
they strengthen one another. One can see how that works: our aim
justifies the means because we say so. Dogmatism couples blind belief
to an already brutal concept. It beckons: stop thinking, follow me and
I'll give you what you want so passionately!

If
we turn our attention to the Obama campaign we hear one mantra: Change,
Action, Belief. The latter represents the dogmatic side: blind faith,
not in the Obama ideas (he doesn't have any) but in his method, while
Change through Action suggests Will to Power: the dogmatic approach to
a subjective aim that justifies the pragmatist means.
There is the negative myth as summed up in
part II by Front Page Magazine author
Ben Johnson's
"The Left's Fairy Tale,"
a shortlist of the main delusions that the Dems and the Leftist world
at large have convinced themselves of. The demonization of George Bush
is not a Sorelian myth, but it lends sufficient fire and motivation to
reach the goal: getting Obama into 'our' White House.
Sit tight for Leonard Peikoff quoting Herman Goerring in
"The Ominous Parallels" (Meridian, 1982, p. 55):
"Just
as the Roman Catholic Church considers the Pope as infallible (...) so
do we National Socialists believe with the same inner conviction that
for us the Leader is (...) simply infallible. [Hitler's authority
derives from] something mystical, inexpressible, almost
incomprehensible which this unique man possesses, and he who cannot
feel it instinctively will not be able to grasp it at all."
If you think that's tacky, compare that to this
load of Postmodern 'spirituality,' according to which Obama is both the infallible Pope and the celestial Leader rolled into One:
"Barack Obama isn't really one of us. Not in the normal way, anyway. (...) The appeal, the pull, the ethereal and magical thing that seems to enthrall millions of people from all over the world,
that keeps opening up and firing into new channels of the culture
normally completely unaffected by politics? No, it's not merely his
youthful vigor, or handsomeness, or even inspiring rhetoric. It is not
fresh ideas or cool charisma or the fact that a black president will be
historic and revolutionary in about a thousand different ways. It is
something more. Even Bill Clinton, with all his effortless, winking
charm, didn't have what Obama has, which is a sort of powerful
luminosity, a unique high-vibration integrity. Dismiss it all you like,
but I've heard from far too many enormously smart, wise, spiritually
attuned people who've been intuitively blown away by Obama's presence - not speeches, not policies, but sheer presence
- to say it's just a clever marketing ploy, a slick gambit carefully
orchestrated by hotshot campaign organizers who, once Obama gets into
office, will suddenly turn from perky optimists to vile soul-sucking
lobbyist whores, with Obama as their suddenly evil, cackling overlord.
Here's where it gets gooey. Many spiritually advanced people I know
(not coweringly religious, mind you, but deeply spiritual) identify
Obama as a Lightworker, that rare kind of attuned being who has the
ability to lead us not merely to new foreign policies or health care
plans or whatnot, but who can actually help usher in a new way of being on the planet, of relating and connecting and engaging with this bizarre earthly experiment. These kinds of people actually help us evolve.
They are philosophers and peacemakers of a very high order, and they
speak not just to reason or emotion, but to the soul. The unusual thing
is, true Lightworkers almost never appear on such a brutal, spiritually
demeaning stage as national politics. This is why Obama is so rare."
Mark Steyn noticed it too:
"Obama the humble savior:" "I
face this challenge with profound humility (...) limitless faith (...)
I am absolutely certain that generations from now, we will be able to
look back and tell our children that this was the moment when we began
to provide care for the sick and good jobs to the jobless; this was the
moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began
to heal … . This was the moment – this was the time – when we came
together to remake this great nation." It's a good thing he's facing it with "profound humility," isn't it? ... Yeah, and divorced from reason ...
- Continued in
Part IV: "Fulfil My Needs"
- Filed on Articles in
"The Political Pathology Page" -